PLMET:

click here to follow the link

Title:

Commentary to the Supreme Court’s decision of June 7th 2016, V KK 30/16

Subject and Keywords:

absolute grounds for reversing the judgment   validation of deficient trial procedures   repeat of the main trial   principle of direct examination of evidence

Abstract:

In the commented decision the Supreme Court presented the view that absence of any of the members of the court panel during the whole trial constitutes absolute grounds for reversing the judgment only if he or she was absent during evidentiary proceedings. The author agrees with this thesis. However, she points out that the Supreme Court took into account – while establishing that absolute grounds for reversal existed – whether the particular procedures conducted during the absence infringed the rights of the accused. The author does not approve of such an approach as leading to unnecessary relativity of absolute grounds for reversing the judgment.

Place of publishing:

Wrocław

Publisher:

E-Wydawnictwo. Prawnicza i Ekonomiczna Biblioteka Cyfrowa. Wydział Prawa, Administracji i Ekonomii Uniwersytetu Wrocławskiego

Date issued:

2017

Detailed Type:

journal

Format:

application/pdf

Identifier:

ISSN 2450-3932

Language:

pol   eng

WUL Catalog:

click here to follow the link

Is part of:

click here to follow the link

Is referenced by:

www.fiw.prawo.uni.wroc.pl

Replaces:

Folia Iuridica Wratislaviensis

Access rights:

The use of this material is allowed only with accordance of applicable rules of fair use or other exceptions provided by law, and any broader use requires the permission of the authorized entity

License:

Making materials available on the basis of the agreement with the owner of the property copyrights

Rights holder:

Copyright by Dorota Czerwińska

Location of original object:

Library of the Faculty of Law, Administration and Economics

Autor opisu:

WR U/PAdjm   TK