@misc{Szydłowska_Karolina_Glosa_2021,
 author={Szydłowska, Karolina},
 copyright={Copyright by CNS},
 copyright={Copyright by Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Wrocławskiego Sp. z o.o., Wrocław 2021},
 address={Wrocław},
 howpublished={online},
 year={2021},
 publisher={Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Wrocławskiego},
 language={pol},
 abstract={The present commentary portrays the topic of interpretation of art. 79(1)(1)(h) from the Act on Court Costs in Civil Cases, in specific if the hypothesis of the given article consists of “out-of-court settlements”. Thesis of the resolution takes a categorical form, however it does not persuade the author of the commentary. Given the present nature of the topic as well as the fiscal theme of the issue, which is important to every participant of the civil proceeding, author attempts to confront the thesis resolved by the Supreme Court with general principles of interpretation, especially with the principle lege non distinguente nec nostrum est distinguere.},
 title={Glosa krytyczna do uchwały Sądu Najwyższego z dnia 23 lutego 2018 roku, III CZP 88/17},
 type={text},
 keywords={settlement, court settlement, settlement made before a mediator, court fee refund},
}