@misc{Wyspiański_Bartosz_Imre_2025,
 author={Wyspiański, Bartosz},
 copyright={Copyright by Wydział Prawa, Administracji i Ekonomii Uniwersytetu Wrocławskiego},
 address={Wrocław},
 howpublished={online},
 year={2025},
 publisher={E-Wydawnictwo. Prawnicza i Ekonomiczna Biblioteka Cyfrowa. Wydział Prawa, Administracji i Ekonomii Uniwersytetu Wrocławskiego},
 language={pol},
 abstract={The aim of this article is to characterize Imre Lakatos’s Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes and to explore the applicability of this methodology within the field of legal sciences, particularly in the history of law and the study of specific branches of law. Imre Lakatos was a Hungarian philosopher of science, including mathematics. He developed a method known as the Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes, which was intended as an intermediary theory between the views of Thomas S. Kuhn and Karl R. Popper. This theory highlights primary elements such as the concept of “anomalies” in science and the “hard core”. The Hungarian philosopher also established criteria for the progressiveness or degeneration of scientific theories, utilizing concepts of negative and positive heuristics. Additionally, he sought criteria for the justification of scientific theories and rational reconstruction. In the author’s view, Lakatos’s},
 title={Imre Lakatosa metodologia naukowych programów badawczych i jej znaczenie dla nauki prawa},
 type={text},
 doi={https://doi.org/10.34616/151578},
 keywords={Imre Lakatos, Thomas S. Kuhn, Karl R. Popper, rationality, philosophy of science},
}