@misc{Fruk_Aleksandra_Posiedzenie_2024,
 author={Fruk, Aleksandra and May, Joanna},
 copyright={Copyright by Wydział Prawa, Administracji i Ekonomii Uniwersytetu Wrocławskiego},
 address={Wroclaw},
 howpublished={online},
 year={2024},
 publisher={E-Wydawnictwo. Prawnicza i Ekonomiczna Biblioteka Cyfrowa. Wydział Prawa, Administracji i Ekonomii Uniwersytetu Wrocławskiego},
 language={pol},
 abstract={The remote hearing in civil proceedings has now become a viable alternative to the traditional hearing. This has been significantly influenced by the epidemic situation, which has forced the need to adapt court proceedings to the new realities of social life. The normative solutions introduced during the COVID-19 pandemic, which were, by their nature, temporary, contributed not only to the implementation of the institution of remote hearings in civil proceedings, but also to their popularization. The article on remote hearings in civil proceedings (due to the limited framework of the study) was divided into three parts. The first part (published in the issue no. 2 (2023) of “Folia Iuridica Universitatis Wratislaviensis”) covered general issues and presented the genesis of the institution in question; it was also an introduction to the issue of remote meetings. This second part of the article presents a remote meeting based on the so-called Covid Act. As part of the considerations, a detailed analysis of the provisions of Art. 15zzs1 of the COVID-19 Act – including comparative interpretation of Art. 15zzs1 point 1 and 3 of the COVID-19 Act (in its original wording – as amended in 2020) and Art. 15zzs1 section 1 point 1 and 2 and section 2 and 3 of the COVID-19 Act (as amended in 2021). The last of the above-mentioned provisions was repealed by the Act of July 7, 2023, which entered into force (in the scope discussed) on March 14, 2024. Consequently, in the last – third part of the publication, new solutions introduced by the amendment of 2024 will be presented.},
 title={Posiedzenie zdalne w postępowaniu cywilnym – geneza, standardy i perspektywy (część II – posiedzenie zdalne na gruncie tzw. ustawy covidowej)},
 type={text},
 doi={https://doi.org/10.34616/151127},
 keywords={de-located hearing, remote hearing, hybrid trial, e-court trial (e-trial), electronic hearing, on-line hearing, video hearing, video conference, video sitting, hybrid hearing},
}