@misc{Chmielecki_Jan_Homo_2022,
 author={Chmielecki, Jan},
 copyright={Copyright by Pracownia Badań Orientalnych, Katedra Doktryn Politycznych i Prawnych Wydziału Prawa, Administracji i Ekonomii Uniwersytetu Wrocławskiego & Authors, Wrocław 2022},
 address={Wrocław},
 howpublished={online},
 year={2022},
 publisher={Katedra Doktryn Politycznych i Prawnych Wydziału Prawa, Administracji i Ekonomii Uniwersytetu Wrocławskiego},
 language={pol},
 abstract={Carl Schmitt’s partisan and Giorgio Agamben’s homo sacer are two terms (figures) which are especially important in these authors’ theories. Schmitt’s theory of partisan is described in his book “Theory of Partisan”, published in 1963. Schmitt claims there, that the figure of partisan is inseparably connected with the concept of political and enmity. Schmitt provides for a typology of partisans, distinguishing two main variants of a partisan – the telluric partisan and the revolutionary partisan. Agamben’s homo sacer is a figure taken from archaic Roman law. A person declared sacer could seek no protection under the law; deprived any protection, he was treated like a dead person. He belonged to the gods of the underworld. However, he was not treated like a “sacred” in the contemporary meaning of this word. It is important that both homo sacer and the partisan are not protected by any law – i.e., anyone can kill them if one wishes so. Therefore, both partisan and homo sacer are excluded from human community.},
 title={Homo sacer Giorgio Agambena i partyzant Carla Schmitta},
 type={text},
 doi={https://doi.org/10.34616/149744},
 keywords={partisan, Carl Schmitt, Giorgio Agamben, sacer, exclusion},
}